(although the image is not as high res as the original),
You try snapping pics of original covers with your iPhone and see how well you can make the final product look!Some day I hope some vmp insider will explain why they always have fuzzy album image transfers.
When is announcement day?
Omg Deb! Can’t stop laughing at this comment! Amazing!You try snapping pics of original covers with your iPhone and see how well you can make the final product look!
I was thinking the same thing when I got my order. You would think it would be a priority. If I were an artist I wouldn’t want them sending out 25,000 copies of my record with a Lo res shot of the cover art. Insane.
even more strange was how they recalled Queen because the album title being too high and that’s not the VMP standard. But entire Lo-res covers in every sub are a-ok.
Based on the Blue Note Anthology fiasco, I think they just don't give a shit. They may not even ask the labels for the cover.I find it weird that they can get the actual master tapes to use for remastering the album, but not some sort of "master photo" to use for the album covers. I don't know if the record label is just like "ok here you can use the tapes, and for the cover you can use this 400x400 jpg from an Angelfire page we made in 1999"
I was thinking the same thing when I got my order. You would think it would be a priority. If I were an artist I wouldn’t want them sending out 25,000 copies of my record with a Lo res shot of the cover art. Insane.
even more strange was how they recalled Queen because the album title being too high and that’s not the VMP standard. But entire Lo-res covers in every sub are a-ok.
Theres a history of this and I dont quite understand why. I have an OG pressing of Blossom Dearie and compared it with the VMP copy a while back. Its just awful what they did. The original is crisp and clear. The VMP copy is massively cropped, blurred, and with horrible levels.I find it weird that they can get the actual master tapes to use for remastering the album, but not some sort of "master photo" to use for the album covers. I don't know if the record label is just like "ok here you can use the tapes, and for the cover you can use this 400x400 jpg from an Angelfire page we made in 1999"
Wow! Probably cropped out some ring wear.Theres a history of this and I dont quite understand why. I have an OG pressing of Blossom Dearie and compared it with the VMP copy a while back. Its just awful what they did. The original is crisp and clear. The VMP copy is massively cropped, blurred, and with horrible levels.
Edit: Decided to dig them out
View attachment 47855
Cropped out the Verve label, though not sure why that was necessary.Wow! Probably cropped out some ring wear.
Theres a history of this and I dont quite understand why. I have an OG pressing of Blossom Dearie and compared it with the VMP copy a while back. Its just awful what they did. The original is crisp and clear. The VMP copy is massively cropped, blurred, and with horrible levels.
Edit: Decided to dig them out
View attachment 47855
This was mentioned when I last posted but to remove that would literally take 10 seconds with the patch tool in photoshop. I would they have graphics people on board anyway so I doubt it is this to be honest.Cropped out the Verve label, though not sure why that was necessary.
Ahh now this makes sense.......but seriously why couldn't they just check it online. Craziness.Ugh I knew it was bad but seeing it side-by-side like that... If I recall, the VMP version is based on some CD edition that was cropped up close like that.
Either way, it's pretty inexcusable. They've been able to go the extra mile for the sound quality of the records themselves, it is baffling how often the artwork just seems like an afterthought.
(btw I'm extremely jealous you have an OG Blossom)
I think you are overestimating the effort they put towards touching up cover scans.This was mentioned when I last posted but to remove that would literally take 10 seconds with the patch tool in photoshop. I would they have graphics people on board anyway so I doubt it is this to be honest.
I think you are overestimating the effort they put towards touching up cover scans.
View attachment 47933
View attachment 47934
View attachment 47935
I'm sure there's more, that was a cursory glance through Classics.
|
|