wokeupnew
Well-Known Member
Even going back to the pioneers like Green Day.
Even going back to the pioneers like Green Day.
Song length doesn’t matter at all IMO. What matters is what the song is doing. Does it need to be longer because the way the artist is writing demands it to be?
This song is too long and feels like it needs to be shorter, it’s a slog. Here the argument of anything over 4/5 minutes makes sense.
This song is long and it needs to be for the whole story the artist/band is trying to convey to come to fruition. I wouldn’t want it any shorter.
Song length is irrelevant without context.
But like going from the Ramones to The Clash to The Hives you can maybe pick a song or 2 from their discography that sound kinda alike but they vary differently.All punk sounds the same. Even going back to the pioneers like Green Day.
All punk sounds the same. Even going back to the pioneers like Green Day.
Grateful Dead are terrible. They're just an excuse for stoners to poke smot and hackey sack. Phish are just GD 2.0.
If you describe your taste in music as 'indie', I know I won't like you.
Mondo is terrible.
All punk sounds the same. Even going back to the pioneers like Green Day.
I mean if you want to stick to the genre of Rock, then sure you can make cases for song length. But Muse can be boring as hell regardless of song length (even though I love their first 4 albums). When you have so many other genre's like jazz or ambient or classical or hip-hop where the length of a song just has zero relevance at all.Not necessarily because it takes a lot of talent to make a long song. So many artists not capable of it just succeed in boring the pants of people *cough* Muse *cough*
Cake sound nothing like the Modern Lovers, what the hell?Oh and for another hot take. I don't get the deal with Cake? Seems like its just an even more boring version of The Modern Lovers and because of Cake we got that Hobo Johnson fellow. At least Hobo has enthusiasm.
Deep Purple > Sabbath w/ Ozzy > Blue CheerBlue Cheer did more for heavy metal than Black Sabbath.
And as Pioneers of punk I don't see Green Day as a leading contender. Bands like Fear, Black Flag and The Descendants would be a more suitable candidate.
Hip hop was not good prior to the release of BDP Criminal Minded
Deep Purple > Sabbath w/ Ozzy > Blue Cheer
When it comes to who did what for Heavy Metal as a whole.
Also Dio sucks.
Pioneers of punk still LMFAO
You’re still at least a decade too late
Maybe try the Stooges
I'm thinking of songs like I'm Straight and Cleopatra. I think it has to do with the overall delivery of the vocal then anything else.Cake sound nothing like the Modern Lovers, what the hell?
that's fair, I can see that. musically nothing alike.I'm thinking of songs like I'm Straight and Cleopatra. I think it has to do with the overall delivery of the vocal then anything else.
But I haven't delved into many of their songs so I'm also alright being wrong
Stooges are still pre-punk imo. Same as MC5 and Velvet Underground.Pioneers of punk still LMFAO
You’re still at least a decade too late
Maybe try the Stooges
I thought this was Hot Takes thread not Obvious Observations.Also, almost all reggae sounds the same.
Honestly I think people like me who at least sort of disagree might be the hot take!Also, almost all reggae sounds the same.