Hot Take/ Musical Confession Thread!

I think most people didn't care to begin with and still don't really care now. If you mean most fans of Louis C.K cancelled him, that's ultimately something that can't be judged but I doubt that as well.



Were there any specific stories of women freezing up and walking out like midway through or did they just freeze up and stay the whole game anyways? Context is highly important.
Also what were the ages? Cause the older you get, the more you should be able to get a grasp of yourself in uncomfortable situations and make a decision for yourself.


It is part of my job to counsel people. Some of the kids I have worked with have been victims of abuse and some have been perpetrators. It changes their lives forever. The first thing you learn in any counseling class is when you interact with a client you never use the word should if you are working with them in order to grow or heal. You are projecting you own experiences and emotions on them. All people are different and thus react differently.
 
I feel like there’s a lot of nuance being left out of this discussion. It seems like the idea is that in these incidents there is one party who is 100% to blame and the other is 100% blameless.

That dog don’t hunt.

Everyone is 100% liable for their own actions. If someone uses their position to facilitate committing acts of violence, prosecute them. If they use their position to coerce others, tell others and call them our for it.

On the flip side, if you find yourself in a shitty situation with a shitty person doing shitty things and take no action to remove yourself from it, that’s on you. Does it absolve the other party for their wrongdoing, not at all. Still, don’t pretend like you lack any agency in the matter.


I don’t see anyone taking the 100% blame vs the 100% blameless argument in here.

I also find your critique of the discussion lacks nuance contradictory to your stance that people are 100% responsible for the actions. That is a very simplistic view of humans and free will, whether we are evaluating a victims or perpetrators
 
I'm sorry, but a lot of this argument you are making sounds like it is steering into "Did you see how she was dressed...she was asking for it" territory. A budding actress, or even an experienced one, might be fully aware that the casting couch exists, but still might find themselves in an uncomfortable or dangerous situation due to chance. I forgot which one, but I believe it was one of Weinstein's victims or potential victims that scheduled a meeting with an agent at a hotel. The agent was ordered to leave at some point behind the scenes, essentially forcing a meeting between the actress and Weinstein in his room. Harvey was a powerful man in Hollywood, even when it came to the careers of established actresses. So, yeah, I can see even smart, intelligent people still getting stuck in a bad situation, and having a hard time just leaving said situation out of basic shock or fear. He had the power to completely blackball an actor, and he used it to get what he wanted. I feel like you are oversimplifying the removing of oneself from a bad situation. Sometimes that kind of thing is easier said than done. This isn't an action movie, after all.

A more accurate summation of my position instead of “did you see what she was wearing - she was asking for it” would be “why did she climb over the railing into the tiger’s pen? That tiger eating her was horrible, but entirely predictable.”

Yes, he had the ability to blackball an actor. Yes I bet everyone of his victims was aware of that. If the choice was between debasing oneself for an acting career or leaving, it was still a choice they made. Just because one is faced with two shitty options doesn’t mean they still didn’t make a choice between them.

In fact I’ll take it one step further and say that if someone trying to make it in Hollywood doesn’t have a plan in advance to deal with that moment when they face the couch, they’re an idiot. Walking out the door or securing yourself away to call the police aren’t action movie fantasies, they’re reasonable courses of action to have planned out in advance when faced with disgusting or possibly dangerous situations like these. We can all agree that it shouldn’t be like this and that hopefully the culture is changing. Still, not planning and acting in accordance to how the world really is instead of what you think it should be is not a recipe for success.

That’s one of the most important lessons I can teach my daughter to prepare her for the world. The world doesn’t care what you think it should be, you need to understand what it actually is and prepare accordingly.

I don’t see anyone taking the 100% blame vs the 100% blameless argument in here.

I also find your critique of the discussion lacks nuance contradictory to your stance that people are 100% responsible for the actions. That is a very simplistic view of humans and free will, whether we are evaluating a victims or perpetrators
That’s exactly the position being taken with regards to critique of the actions (or lack thereof) taken by the victims. “The men were powerful and the victims didn’t have any choice.” That’s frankly a load of bullshit. It removes any and all agency from the targets of these assholes.

You can call my position simplistic, but I don’t care. You, me, and every other non-mentally deficient adult are 100% morally responsible and liable for the consequences of our choices. I don’t care if you had a shitty childhood (I did). I don’t care if you were molested (I was). I don’t care if you had substance abuse issues (I did). I don’t care if you are broke and homeless (been there too). I don’t give a damn what is wrong with your life, you are 100% responsible for the choices you make and things you do. The sooner folks realize that, the better off their life will be.

The biggest thing we can do to fuck up kids and set them on the path to destruction is to tell them the lie that they are a victim of their circumstances. Folks who do that should not only not be allowed around children, they should be strung up like pedos because they’re no less harmful to them.

A universal and constant truth is that life is shitty, but how you deal with that fact is entirely up to you.
 
Last edited:
@Joe Mac - What your five favourite David Bowie albums? I want you to rank your five favourite David Bowie albums!

After you named PJ Harvey's "Is This Desire?" your second favourite album of hers, I was impressed!

I purchased David Bowie's "Let's Dance" recently and I really like it! I love Nile Rodgers contribution to that album! I have never been so ready to get into David Bowie and I know you are a David Bowie expert! I have immersed myself into The Smiths and own three of their records on vinyl and I love spinning them!

I think I remember you really liking Low, Hunky Dory and Heroes. Wasn't "Low" your favourite Bowie album? David Bowie is quite avant-garde/experimental/ahead of his time, so I am sure I will enjoy his best-regarded albums!
 
@Joe Mac - What your five favourite David Bowie albums? I want you to rank your five favourite David Bowie albums!

I think after you named PJ Harvey's "Is This Desire?" your second favourite album of hers, I was impressed!

I purchased David Bowie's "Let's Dance" recently and I really like it! I love Nile Rodgers contribution to that album! I have never been so ready to get into David Bowie and I know you are a David Bowie expert! I have immersed myself into The Smiths and own three of their records on vinyl and I love spinning them!

I think I remember you really liking Low, Hunky Dory and Heroes. Wasn't "Low" your favourite Bowie album? David Bowie is quite avant-garde/experimental/ahead of his time, so I am sure I will enjoy his best-regarded albums!

Top 5 is hard.... also I’m going to redirect this from here to the Bowie thread because I now actually hate this thread, despite being drawn back into it like a moth to the flame...
 
Top 5 is hard.... also I’m going to redirect this from here to the Bowie thread because I now actually hate this thread, despite being drawn back into it like a moth to the flame...
ok, let's go to the Bowie thread! I typed' David Bowie' in the search engine but didn't see the thread. Happy to know there is a dedicated thread!
 
A 'Problematic Fave thread' has been created. Please take this discussion there.

This thread should be reserved for discussions about how David Bowie is at least 10 times more important and influential than the Beatles and Rolling Stones combined.

 
A 'Problematic Fave thread' has been created. Please take this discussion there.

This thread should be reserved for discussions about how David Bowie is at least 10 times more important and influential than the Beatles and Rolling Stones combined.

you could make a case for that, that's not that spicy of a take
 
I've def heard it at some point. I think it was this old big record store run by one dude with long hair. He priced all his records at discogs market value, so maybe some correlation exists b/t that and weird pronunciations of names
Maybe you are getting David Bowie and James Bowie mixed up cuz James Bowie is pronounced Boo-wie he also invented quite a knife.
 
I like the way British announcers pronounce Bowie. They go with Boww-ee rather than Bo-ee. I don't do it myself, but I like hearing it.

Boo-ee? really? Weird

Both pronunciations are Bowie. 99% of people in the U.K. would pronounce it as bow as in bow and arrow rather than bow as in bow to the queen.
 
Maybe you are getting David Bowie and James Bowie mixed up cuz James Bowie is pronounced Boo-wie he also invented quite a knife.


As an American History Major (many many many many many many years ago) I feel compelled to clear this up. James Boo-wie did not "invent" a knife (although there is some debate among historians, most do not ascirbe to the conclusion that Bowie designed/crafted the knife but was just a badass who carried it) and the story behind that is WAY more interesting than he just "invented" a knife.

Bowie and the knife became famous because of what happened in Bowie's duel with Sherriff Norris Wright (at The Sandbar Fight).The knife was reportedly Bowie's regular hunting knife that he carried with him at all times after Wright shot at Bowie. After that altercation and sometime later, Bowie and Wright got in to another altercation resulting in a duel. During that duel (using pistols), neither man was hit by a bullet. After the two men shook hands to resolve the fight, their entourage began fighting. Bowie gets shot by Wright's entourage, then charges at the man who shot him with his knife. The man pistol whips Bowie and knocks Bowie down. Then Wright shoots at Bowie as he is laying on the ground. Wright then draws his sword and impales Bowie and then places his foot in Bowie's chest retrieve the sword. That's when Bowie pulls Wright down to him and guts him with this hunting knife. With Wright's sword sticking out of him, Bowie gets up, gets shot again and stabbed again by Wright's entourage. Somehow, Bowie survives and later dies in the Battle of Alamo.

James Bowie was basically John Wick of the 1800's .
 

As an American History Major (many many many many many many years ago) I feel compelled to clear this up. James Boo-wie did not "invent" a knife (although there is some debate among historians, most do not ascirbe to the conclusion that Bowie designed/crafted the knife but was just a badass who carried it) and the story behind that is WAY more interesting than he just "invented" a knife.

Bowie and the knife became famous because of what happened in Bowie's duel with Sherriff Norris Wright (at The Sandbar Fight).The knife was reportedly Bowie's regular hunting knife that he carried with him at all times after Wright shot at Bowie. After that altercation and sometime later, Bowie and Wright got in to another altercation resulting in a duel. During that duel (using pistols), neither man was hit by a bullet. After the two men shook hands to resolve the fight, their entourage began fighting. Bowie gets shot by Wright's entourage, then charges at the man who shot him with his knife. The man pistol whips Bowie and knocks Bowie down. Then Wright shoots at Bowie as he is laying on the ground. Wright then draws his sword and impales Bowie and then places his foot in Bowie's chest retrieve the sword. That's when Bowie pulls Wright down to him and guts him with this hunting knife. With Wright's sword sticking out of him, Bowie gets up, gets shot again and stabbed again by Wright's entourage. Somehow, Bowie survives and later dies in the Battle of Alamo.

James Bowie was basically John Wick of the 1800's .
Ho.Ly.Shit.

Awesome
 
Boo-ee? really? Weird

Both pronunciations are Bowie. 99% of people in the U.K. would pronounce it as bow as in bow and arrow rather than bow as in bow to the queen.

I shouldn't have implied that all presenters pronounce it that way. But I have heard a number of them over the years pronounce his last name Bow-ee as in Bow to the Queen. I remember Lauren Laverne saying it that way when I listened to here xfm show years back.
 

As an American History Major (many many many many many many years ago) I feel compelled to clear this up. James Boo-wie did not "invent" a knife (although there is some debate among historians, most do not ascirbe to the conclusion that Bowie designed/crafted the knife but was just a badass who carried it) and the story behind that is WAY more interesting than he just "invented" a knife.

Bowie and the knife became famous because of what happened in Bowie's duel with Sherriff Norris Wright (at The Sandbar Fight).The knife was reportedly Bowie's regular hunting knife that he carried with him at all times after Wright shot at Bowie. After that altercation and sometime later, Bowie and Wright got in to another altercation resulting in a duel. During that duel (using pistols), neither man was hit by a bullet. After the two men shook hands to resolve the fight, their entourage began fighting. Bowie gets shot by Wright's entourage, then charges at the man who shot him with his knife. The man pistol whips Bowie and knocks Bowie down. Then Wright shoots at Bowie as he is laying on the ground. Wright then draws his sword and impales Bowie and then places his foot in Bowie's chest retrieve the sword. That's when Bowie pulls Wright down to him and guts him with this hunting knife. With Wright's sword sticking out of him, Bowie gets up, gets shot again and stabbed again by Wright's entourage. Somehow, Bowie survives and later dies in the Battle of Alamo.

James Bowie was basically John Wick of the 1800's .
That’s amazing. Inventor or not, he definitely deserves having the knife named after him after that! Thanks for the history lesson.
 
Back
Top