MikeH
Well-Known Member
I saw some people say that doing 3 at most is the sweet spot.
Record cleaning - what's your method?
- Thread starter lazylistener
- Start date
Dylanfan253
Active Member
If it’s a 6 liter cavitation bath like I have do two records at a time with my vinyl stack, when I clean three at a time which is it’s capacity it’s obvious it doesn’t work.
Widget
Member
What cleaning solution would you guys suggest for an ultrasonic cleaner?
Dylanfan253
Active Member
I just use the mix of isopropyl alcohol and distilled water that kirmuss audio recommends and use both disc doctor solution and brushed and the kirmuss audio surfactant for additional cleaning.
Dtknuckles
Well-Known Member
Was looking at the pro-ject VC-E. What are peoples’ thoughts.
My assumption is that multiple records act as as "baffles" and increasingly dampen the turbulent vibrations in the tank as more records are added. Eventually you reach a point where the vibrations are rendered too weak to effectively clean records. That's my guess based on freshman physics, so take it for what it's worth.
Crabbers
Well-Known Member
Any truth to the rumors that were discussed yesterday around Analog sites about how the zerodust leaves a residue that is harmful for the stylus?
www.analogplanet.com
Time to Put Away The Onzow ZeroDust?
These latest microscope photos from WAM Engineering LLC (WallyTools) offer dramatic evidence that the Onzow Zerodust leaves a stubborn, difficult to remove residue on "clean" styli as well as on cantilevers. It's a troubling discovery. This first photo shows an Onzow Zerodust "clean" stylus with...
www.analogplanet.com
kvetcha
Well-Known Member
I’m curious to see more independent verification, but the photos are pretty damning.Any truth to the rumors that were discussed yesterday around Analog sites about how the zerodust leaves a residue that is harmful for the stylus?
Time to Put Away The Onzow ZeroDust?
These latest microscope photos from WAM Engineering LLC (WallyTools) offer dramatic evidence that the Onzow Zerodust leaves a stubborn, difficult to remove residue on "clean" styli as well as on cantilevers. It's a troubling discovery. This first photo shows an Onzow Zerodust "clean" stylus with...
Selaws
Well-Known Member
It was mentioned verrry briefly during the recent 'discussions' with Chad Kassem and Mike Esposito but I wasn't aware of it until then. Pretty shocking photos though.Any truth to the rumors that were discussed yesterday around Analog sites about how the zerodust leaves a residue that is harmful for the stylus?
Time to Put Away The Onzow ZeroDust?
These latest microscope photos from WAM Engineering LLC (WallyTools) offer dramatic evidence that the Onzow Zerodust leaves a stubborn, difficult to remove residue on "clean" styli as well as on cantilevers. It's a troubling discovery. This first photo shows an Onzow Zerodust "clean" stylus with...
Mr Moustache
Well-Known Member
For some reasons (that has to do with the shape of the stylus I guess) my 2M Bronze attracted a lot more of dust than a previous elliptical. I used the onzow a couple times, with mixed results. ow that I clean my records with the HG almost every time before playing them, I don't have the dust attached to the stylus anymore (though maybe still some residual goo from the Onzow?).Any truth to the rumors that were discussed yesterday around Analog sites about how the zerodust leaves a residue that is harmful for the stylus?
Time to Put Away The Onzow ZeroDust?
These latest microscope photos from WAM Engineering LLC (WallyTools) offer dramatic evidence that the Onzow Zerodust leaves a stubborn, difficult to remove residue on "clean" styli as well as on cantilevers. It's a troubling discovery. This first photo shows an Onzow Zerodust "clean" stylus with...
After ultrasonic cleaning, records I purchased new starting since the mid 60's still play with negligible surface noise, and ones purchased used range from little to no noise. Many that are over 50 years old are as quiet as digital. Granted I have always handled my records carefully through the years.
Crabbers
Well-Known Member
clean every record with the HG every time before play? wow thats dedication
Mr Moustache
Well-Known Member
Yeah, if it's the first time I clean the record with the HG I do a 5 min clean and an auto deep clean. If it was previously cleaned, just a quick auto clean before putting it on the plater.clean every record with the HG every time before play? wow thats dedication
kvetcha
Well-Known Member
You're a lot more patient than I am.
Mr Moustache
Well-Known Member
Just have to be patient during the first record. Then you clean the next while the previous one is playing.You're a lot more patient than I am.
kvetcha
Well-Known Member
My setup's in the same room, sadly.
Mr Moustache
Well-Known Member
I see, yeah no I couldn't stand that. I really need to keep the door shut and play some music when that thing is on.My setup's in the same room, sadly.
I've used a similar one to clean about 125 records so far and have had excellent results. If money wasn't an object a purpose built ultrasonic cleaner would be nice. I'm on a budget however and seek the most bang for my buck. The DIY ultrasonics may not be pretty, but they provide similar cleaning at a fraction of the cost.
Last edited: