Hemotep
Well-Known Member
I like that it kicked his Beavis and Butthead sons in the nads too. Damn shame it didn't get his crook of a daughter too.Judge Orders Trump to Pay $364 Million, Strips Business Licenses
I like that it kicked his Beavis and Butthead sons in the nads too. Damn shame it didn't get his crook of a daughter too.Judge Orders Trump to Pay $364 Million, Strips Business Licenses
same as it ever was.The majority of Generation Z do not feel financially stable and still rely on parents to help pay bills.
This all stems from the debt of student loans and high cost of living. Inflation hasn't made anything better.
This can't be sustainable.
And what really grinds me gears is you hear about all these financial advisors giving opinion pieces that pretty much say that Generation Z is living above their means and needs to scale back their lifestyles. That they make good money, and the issue is they are scaling up the amount of money they spend too much compared to their salaries. That they are not financially responsible because they had helicopter parents and don't know how to balance a budget.
Okay, but balancing a budget is much harder today than it was for you when you were the same age. Your same salary got you much further. Today, it's extremely tight on just the basics.
I think the video you uploaded last night was an illegal rip. I tried to watch and the quality was terrible.And here is why it's not on YouTube right now. I guess it was accidentally released to early around 9:30 pm last night when they uploaded and swiftly taken down.
HBO Delaying ‘Last Week Tonight’ Segments on YouTube
The delay in posting to the video site is intended to nudge more people to watch the show on Max.www.hollywoodreporter.com
I thought it was from his channel, but I quickly looked for it on my phone after watching the episode on MAX to share here.I think the video you uploaded last night was an illegal rip. I tried to watch and the quality was terrible.
Very excited for Alex Garland's new film and find the visceral reaction people are having hilarious. The guy writes some of the smartest sci-fi of the 21st century and people are worried it's going to be a pro-war movie? The test screenings have been very positive, trailers are always misleading.
It's also an A24 produced film, with their largest budget to date (by a wide margin) at 50 million. Considering the have the most consistently great output of anybody in the movie industry, I'm really hoping this thing doesn't bomb.
Thoughts?
Very excited for Alex Garland's new film and find the visceral reaction people are having hilarious. The guy writes some of the smartest sci-fi of the 21st century and people are worried it's going to be a pro-war movie? The test screenings have been very positive, trailers are always misleading.
It's also an A24 produced film, with their largest budget to date (by a wide margin) at 80 million. Considering the have the most consistently great output of anybody in the movie industry, I'm really hoping this thing doesn't bomb.
Thoughts?
I think Devs might have been one of the more successful efforts on that front, despite getting a pretty lukewarm audience reception. It's the one I think about the most.Obviously no one can say until they've seen the movie. However, this is a pretty weird "what if?" to be cogitating on, considering how much closer we are to an actual civil war than ever. I've gotten the impression the movie's going to avoid any real-world parallels, which seems especially baffling. I'll be the stick in the mud and say I'm not as enamored with Garland's work as others; he's collaborated on some great stuff, but most of his movies make overtures towards thematic depth which is eventually dashed on the rocks of third-act action climax. I'm downright baffled by Ex Machina's sterling reputation; it's a fine movie. Similarly, the trailers and images (such as this poster) lead me to believe we're getting more "it really makes ya think huh, man?" from Mr. Garland; all provocation, not much introspection.
Also can't tell if you meant this for this thread or the movie thread
Obviously no one can say until they've seen the movie. However, this is a pretty weird "what if?" to be cogitating on, considering how much closer we are to an actual civil war than ever. I've gotten the impression the movie's going to avoid any real-world parallels, which seems especially baffling. I'll be the stick in the mud and say I'm not as enamored with Garland's work as others; he's collaborated on some great stuff, but most of his movies make overtures towards thematic depth which is eventually dashed on the rocks of third-act action climax. I'm downright baffled by Ex Machina's sterling reputation; it's a fine movie. Similarly, the trailers and images
(such as this poster) lead me to believe we're getting more "it really makes ya think huh, man?" from Mr. Garland; all provocation, not much introspection.
Funny you should mention because Garland also wrote The Beach lolMeanwhile, while Boyle is one of the most talented directors of his era, he is similar to Ridley Scott in that he is only as good as the script he has in hand... as evidenced by films like Yesterday, Trance and the Beach. So does Garland not deserve credit for 28 Days Later?
Funny you should mention because Garland also wrote The Beach lol
Could've sworn he co-wrote the screenplay too, but you're rightSure. He wrote the book though, not the screenplay.