Indymisanthrope
Well-Known Member
Good call on the protective custody angle of the first question, that’s not a bad theory. It raises another question though: who gets unplugged, and why? In the first film, Tank and Dozer are the only crew members of the Nebuchadnezzar to have been born naturally, in Zion. Everyone else has a neck port so, following the rules established by the film, they were all woken up, probably as children. By whom? When? For what reason? Were they all at one time candidates for The One? If not, what other circumstances lead to one being extracted from the matrix? The sequels ask the audience to invest some emotion in characters who the films signal to us are important, but the in media res nature of the narrative prevents us from first knowing them enough to truly care.Yeah, I think they realized that ending movie one with Neo being Computer Jesus painted them into a corner. I do think they took a savvy path by trying to question and subvert the messiah narrative, even if they get clumsy with it. I think the idea of this all being cyclical is cool, and this time around I picked up more on the key difference in Neo: while all the previous Ones were in love with humanity and wanted to save everyone, Neo simply loves Trinity, and puts her before humanity. The movie could maybe underline that a bit better, but it’s fine.
As for your thoughts, I overall think you’re right; the first movie ends on a note and with strands that the sequels aren’t especially concerned with:
1. After the sequels, I wonder more if those kids in the Oracle’s living room are programs under her protection, like Sati in Revolutions. But I can’t say for sure. Definitely hoping to see Spoon Boy in 4.
2. I think Neo’s message is to the machines; he’s telling them he’s going to “show them a world without you.” He doesn’t know what comes next, and he places that choice in their hands. Imo the movie does end on this note of “he’s going to save the world by…flying….???”
And you’re right, he’s talking to the machines in that message, I forgot. I guess I always thought that one interesting component of the matrix is that everyday people aren’t too blind to be able to recognize when weird stuff is going on around them (like the cops recognizing superhuman rooftop jumps, for example). So I had harbored some desire for the sequels being about Neo taking the fight public, as it were. Demonstrating his godlike nature out in the open and/or hijacking the network itself to “broadcast” the truth. When I was a teenager who heard that the 3rd film was going to be called Revolutions, I was imagining an uprising of a (sorry) redpilled world.
Agree that the messianic stuff is tricky, especially for a character who is truly a blank slate (we don’t know ANYthing about Thomas Anderson before—or after—he meets Morpheus, although that would only help so much, since that life only exists as computer code). Blank Check rightly notes that the Wachowskis have veered really far away from the messianic stuff by the time they get to Cloud Atlas and start pushing the thought that actually everyone and everything are equally important and connected.
Looking forward to what Resurrections has to say, particularly after the years since the Wachowskis have both transitioned and seen so many of their concepts subsumed into toxic culture. I’m going to go into it with low expectations for tight plotting but high expectations for a lot of ideas to reflect on later.