Political Discussion

Joe Mac said:
Perhaps. But it does feel like every option we, as combined western nations, over the last hundred years has made this situation worse. We’ve allowed white European settlers to invade and take over a Arab nation based on biblical text and supported it based on guilt and wanting a sphere of influence in that geographical area to the point where there is an effective theocracy which seems to continually strive to wipe out their neighbours by a combination of creeping illegal settlement and military might. Then out of the other sides of our mouths we then severely criticise and crucify the desperate Palestinian for all acts of violence in opposition to this and exacerbate this by legitimising massive military action in response to it.

As someone living in the country I do this all feels depressingly familiar and wrong.
Click to expand...
100%. So what's the answer? There are children in Israel too.
 
Indymisanthrope said:
100%. So what's the answer? There are children in Israel too.
Click to expand...

Exactly. So a bit like with the North there needs to be a fudge. The occupation may have been wrong but it’s too established and entrenched to just fuck them out of it.

The answer is the same it has always been, a two state solution with Jerusalem as an independent city state under the control of neither. We just need to commit to this and to potentially sanctioning our ally to achieve it.
 
Joe Mac said:
We just need to commit to this and to potentially sanctioning our ally to achieve it.
Click to expand...
That only takes care of 50% of the parties involved. Much of the remaining 50% is still governed, to the extent that there is still anything left to govern, by a body that is dedicated to the complete destruction of our ally.
 
RenegadeMonster said:
www.marketwatch.com

Here’s what Gen Z wants employers to know about how they work

Gen Z’s distrust of institutions puts it on a collision course with management.
www.marketwatch.com www.marketwatch.com

I saw this article being discussed elsewhere and one common theme I saw from Boomers was that Gen Z is going to get a serious wake up call. And this mindset in the work place is only going to get them fired and hopefully they will learn.

Many went on to post about how their employers have fired Gen Z people over posts on social media calling out their employer for prioritizing profits over what is right and ethical.

I strongly believe in what Gen Z is trying to do and bring attention too. I wonder if it will help bring about change or just lead to more frequent job changes for Gen Z?
Click to expand...
Golly these articles are very familiar to what I heard when I entered the workforce. I think the boomers don't realize they didn't completely beat my generation down with their disdain.
8hhkrq.jpg

ETA: lol the comments on that article. I have no time for "phones bad"/"young people stupid" discourse.
 
Indymisanthrope said:
That only takes care of 50% of the parties involved. Much of the remaining 50% is still governed, to the extent that there is still anything left to govern, by a body that is dedicated to the complete destruction of our ally.
Click to expand...

Well actually no because it’s as clear as day that our ally is governed by people who are dedicated to the complete destruction of the notion of Palestine and the idea of Palestinians as a distinct group of people.
 
Indymisanthrope said:
That only takes care of 50% of the parties involved. Much of the remaining 50% is still governed, to the extent that there is still anything left to govern, by a body that is dedicated to the complete destruction of our ally.
Click to expand...
I’ve begun watching the Daily Show again and Jon put forth a “solution” seems reasonable which was for a demilitarized zone between the two countries that would be controlled by a collation on middle eastern countries. Problem is no country in their right mind would want to stick their military in between these two warring factions. Also, that would only account for Gaza and not the West Bank.
 
Indymisanthrope said:
So we're back to 0%?
Click to expand...

Well we can’t allow the entire area to be annexed by Israel. Palestine needs to exist but can’t exist in a larger greater Palestine pre Israel state. Nothing is ideal here. But the only game in town is a two state solution and the big barrier to that is the intransigence of your ally.

Peace needs to be found. Ordinary people in both countries want to no longer have to wake up to their children dying. That might take a begrudging peace. It might take a tenuous peace. It might take both sides being equally discommoded and grumbling. But a fragile peace can be found and held if America leans hard enough on Israel.

The current situation is the worst of all worlds and cannot be tolerated any longer.
 
Joe Mac said:
the big barrier to that is the intransigence of your ally.
Click to expand...
That's all a matter of perspective though, isn't it?

And look, I'm not trying to legitimize the Zionist viewpoint here, but *from their perspective,* Gaza is governed by an organization whose official platform refuses to acknowledge the existence of Israel, refuses any two state solution, and swears to pursue its destruction by any means possible including attacks like 10/7.

Obviously, Israel has the arms & wealth here that make them the target of most of the criticism on this point, for good reason, but it's not like Hamas is a dove either.
 
TenderLovingKiller® said:
I think it’s for the best TBH, Trump is going to lose since, theoretically; if they were to uphold his immunity claim, Biden could have all the conservative Supreme Court justices murdered on his way out of office if he so chose and would not be held accountable. It’s should be early enough that these cases should be still be able to move forward without much delay.

If the courts chose not to rule this sort of thing could continue to pop up. This should end it for now.
Click to expand...

Don't count on Alito or Thomas to rule against this. If presidents have complete immunity, we might as well shut it down as a country. This is some scary shit right here.
 
Twentytwo said:
Don't count on Alito or Thomas to rule against this. If presidents have complete immunity, we might as well shut it down as a country. This is some scary shit right here.
Click to expand...
If they rule in favor then Biden might as well just have them all killed. What would stop him other than his idiotic belief that Republicans would never do that if they could?
 
Twentytwo said:
Don't count on Alito or Thomas to rule against this. If presidents have complete immunity, we might as well shut it down as a country. This is some scary shit right here.
Click to expand...
Yeah, Biden is still president though. If they granted King/God status to the Presidency then Biden would also have criminal immunity. Alito and Thomas better get their Billionaire BFF’s to build them one heck of a bunker to hide in..
 
RenegadeMonster said:
If for sure is scary if someone other than Biden is in power.

You all are given Biden to much Credit. Sleepy Joe will do nothing.
Click to expand...
Oh, I know. I'm just saying it's a stupid argument and would be the end of our republic if they ruled that way. You can't have democracy without accountability.
 
Hemotep said:
Of course, I wouldn't put it past the craven idiots on the Supreme Court to do just that.
Click to expand...
They would essentially end all check and balances and completely cede any power they have as an all powerful/corrupt Executive would have an axe hanging over their heads on every decision they made. SCOTUS even the most craven of the bunch wouldn’t be willing to give up that power.
 
Indymisanthrope said:
That's all a matter of perspective though, isn't it?

And look, I'm not trying to legitimize the Zionist viewpoint here, but *from their perspective,* Gaza is governed by an organization whose official platform refuses to acknowledge the existence of Israel, refuses any two state solution, and swears to pursue its destruction by any means possible including attacks like 10/7.

Obviously, Israel has the arms & wealth here that make them the target of most of the criticism on this point, for good reason, but it's not like Hamas is a dove either.
Click to expand...

Its difficult. But it is possible to come to agreements between parties that were previously reject. It’s even possible to have parties who don’t believe in the legitimacy of a state act within its institutions to represent their people and ensure peace. Even if it’s rarely smooth or perfectly ideal.

What we need here is pressure on both sides and an honest broker.

America, and Britain, cannot be that honest broker here. They also can’t put the pressure on Palestinians and Hamas. They have no legitimacy, they deserve no legitimacy. We have to stop dictating to the Arab world and to start to build strategic alliances and use that to have parties with legacy put that pressure on the other side.

On Hamas, I agree with you totally. But people only turn to and support that when there is no other avenue. Consider that Isreal has operated strategically to destroy the PLO and to prop up Hamas to destroy the credibility of a two state system in the wider world.
 
Joe Mac said:
But a fragile peace can be found and held if America leans hard enough on Israel.
Click to expand...
I would love to believe this but I think it assumes facts not in evidence. It doesn't negate the need for the US to do this, but why do we think, after all that has transpired, that there's no retaliation in the cards?

Edit: I don't know why I responded to an earlier comment again, didn't intend to but I'll let it stand.
 
Indymisanthrope said:
I would love to believe this but I think it assumes facts not in evidence. It doesn't negate the need for the US to do this, but why do we think, after all that has transpired, that there's no retaliation in the cards?
Click to expand...

I live in a country that a portion of is living proof that there is enough pressure from each side, a broker and a genuine desire to stop bloodshed that a peace, no matter how fragile, begrudging and arkward, can be found. It involves America putting serious pressure on Israel though and I don’t know if there is the appetite to do that.
 
Joe Mac said:
I live in a country that a portion of is living proof that there is enough pressure from each side, a broker and a genuine desire to stop bloodshed that a peace, no matter how fragile, begrudging and arkward, can be found. It involves America putting serious pressure on Israel though and I don’t know if there is the appetite to do that.
Click to expand...
Would Ireland be able to work as a peace broker given their experience? Have they attempted to previously? It seems like they could offer a relatable perspective. Isn’t Sin Fein a legitimate party now? Maybe get a small envoy of Catholics and Protestants peacemakers try to press for peace using their experience as an example?

Would that be a possibility?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top