Political Discussion

I think the elephant in the room is that they use their insane wealth to influence government creation of tax law in the first place and to lobby against anyone even thinking that billionaires should even consider paying an equitable tax rate.
This is the biggest problem I have with billionaires. It's not that they avoid paying taxes, it's that they get laws specifically tailored to them and their business interests. The issue I have is that they are eroding our capitalism and our democracy because they have such undo influence. And they continually use that influence to gain more wealth while passing laws that make it easier to take and exploit from us for their benefit and we are all left holding the bags. The only socialism going on in America is corporate socialism. When we, as tax payers, have to bail out big banks because they make bad business decisions, when we subsidize Bezos's jaunt into space, we are not only letting these guys off the hook, but we are actually paying out more in taxes TO them, so that their businesses can be profitable. If your business plan banks on your employees being able to get government aid, you don't have a profitable business.
Yeah but I guess what I'm saying is that it's more like Bezos' assistant going down and getting that free soup and then bringing it back to him. The buck stops with him, no doubt. But it wouldn't surprise me at. all. if he learned about his claim of that tax credit through the same news story that you and I learned about it from. He's just some guy paying other people with a mission statement that I imagine amounts to "keep me rich and save me money." To Joe's point, that directive obviously has far-reaching and profound implications in how it's applied by the people who have a financial incentive to do so. But how far into the weeds is he personally going about each and every deduction or credit? I genuinely don't know the answer to the question of just how familiar the hyper-rich are with their own taxes.
Oh I'm sure it's a lackey that does all of this, but it's not so much that I get annoyed that they use loop holes, but moreso that they are usually the ones advocating to congress to keep all their loopholes in place. I also get very annoyed when tax payers are expected to subsidize private business or private individuals (like Bezos in Space) but we don't get anything for it. We didn't get any stock for bailing out banks or helping billionaires get to space. These individuals and their companies are supposedly making money hand over fist. If that's true, then why is it that the taxpayer constantly has to bail out corporations? If these corporations are ducking out on taxes, should they get taxpayer funds? Why didn't we get anything from AIG for helping bail them out? Why don't we send WalMart the bill for the government aid that their employees are forced to accept because WM doesn't pay a living wage?

The problem I have with all of it is that these corporations and billionaires hire a bevy of lawyers and accountants to make sure they pay as little taxes as they can, and then turn around and ask for tax payer money constantly. They constantly whine that they should be where they are because of capitalism, but with their influence making laws, they push anti-competitive legislation to keep them where they are. I know that if I have never worked or only worked part time, I wouldn't be eligible for unemployment services, because I never paid into the system. We need to start demanding that they pay into the system if they want something out of it. And we should be getting financial assets from these corporations and people whenever we bail them out.
 
In other news, woke white people need to stop saying Latinx

I always hear this statement (about "woke white people" using that term), yet most people I know who use Latinx are actually part of that group. I think of it the same way as people who refuse to recognize someone's pronouns.
 
In other news, woke white people need to stop saying Latinx

But that isn’t what this poll is really indicating. It‘s more saying that woke white people (along with whomever else) can call us whatever as long as it’s not a racial slur or epithet.
 
Last edited:
This is maybe the best argument against "Latinx" that I've seen so far, and something I hadn't considered before now:


I hadn't really looked into the history of the term:

“White people did not make up Latinx,” he says. “It was queer Latinx people... They are the ones who used the word. Our little subgroup of the community created that. It was created by English-speaking U.S. Latinx people for use in English conversation.”

\\\
So apparently it was never meant to be a Spanish word.

from Latino, Hispanic, Latinx, Chicano: The History Behind the Terms
 
I hadn't really looked into the history of the term:

“White people did not make up Latinx,” he says. “It was queer Latinx people... They are the ones who used the word. Our little subgroup of the community created that. It was created by English-speaking U.S. Latinx people for use in English conversation.”

\\\
So apparently it was never meant to be a Spanish word.

from Latino, Hispanic, Latinx, Chicano: The History Behind the Terms
Interesting. Maybe not surprising given the use of "folx" by some of the same groups.
 

To no surprise Greg Abbott called for a second specially session today. It will start 12 hours after the previous one ends.

In addition to the voter suppression, the filing for the special session also shows he trying to pass a bill that would ban mask mandates in schools.
 
Best healthcare in the world thanks to no universal health care!:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

The top-performing countries overall are Norway, the Netherlands, and Australia (Exhibit 1).

The next three countries in the ranking — the U.K., Germany, and New Zealand — perform very similarly to one another (Exhibit 2). The U.S. ranks #11 — last. Exhibit 2 shows the extent to which the U.S. is an outlier: its performance falls well below the average of the other countries and far below the two countries ranked directly above it, Switzerland and Canada. In fact, the U.S. is such an outlier that we have calculated the average performance based on the other 10 countries, excluding the U.S. (see How We Measured Performance). The U.S. is last on all domains of performance except care process, on which it ranks #2.
 
Speaking of healthcare @nolalady , I had my physical last week and talked to my doctor about labs. I can't afford them. Until my deductible is met, I owe 100% of the bill due for labs.

When talking about this with my doctor there is no such thing as "preventative labs" anymore. It's something the insurance industry had made sure to eliminate. Labs can't be preventative because if they find anything, it's a preexisting condition.

Most insurance companies have also done away with "annual labs" and they generally bill the patient for 20% for all lab services in a co-insurance format. My insurance unfortunately, makes me pick up the entire tab until my deductible is met.

Last time I had my annual labs my bill was more than $400.

Yup, we have the best healthcare in the world :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
You have some actual data on this?
My viewpoint is admittedly based on anecdotal evidence. I spent the last year and a half seeing story after story of government imposed mandates closing and driving small business owners out of business. From gyms to restaurants and beyond, folks who at least wanted to attempt to serve their customers who wanted to patronize them were prevented from doing so sometimes at gunpoint by local and state orders.

The pandemic absolutely was going to result in economic fallout and damage, but I still maintain that government lockdown orders exacerbated that damage.

I do find it interesting for all of the hate for Bezos, the Waltons, and other megacorps, there seems to be a lot of folks dead set on actions that will only continue to make them stronger as they are the ones who have come out of the last year economically better than they went into it.
 
My viewpoint is admittedly based on anecdotal evidence. I spent the last year and a half seeing story after story of government imposed mandates closing and driving small business owners out of business. From gyms to restaurants and beyond, folks who at least wanted to attempt to serve their customers who wanted to patronize them were prevented from doing so sometimes at gunpoint by local and state orders.

The pandemic absolutely was going to result in economic fallout and damage, but I still maintain that government lockdown orders exacerbated that damage.

I do find it interesting for all of the hate for Bezos, the Waltons, and other megacorps, there seems to be a lot of folks dead set on actions that will only continue to make them stronger as they are the ones who have come out of the last year economically better than they went into it.

The unemployment rate in Tx is slightly lower than California.

Despite severe restrictions CA still outpaced Tx in gdp for 2020, by a lot.


Per capita infection rate in CA are lower than Texas.


Same is true for the death rates.

 
The unemployment rate in Tx is slightly lower than California.

Despite severe restrictions CA still outpaced Tx in gdp for 2020, by a lot.


Per capita infection rate in CA are lower than Texas.


Same is true for the death rates.

Citing the straight GDP isn’t helpful. California has long outpaced Texas GDP by a significant amount. That doesn’t mean a whole lot. Even a 2019-2020 comparison of gdp %growth wouldn’t be a true tell. You’d have to do a longer term comparison of trends in a multitude of data points to get an accurate picture. Things like population changes, per capita changes, business openings/closings, etc before you could really determine the economic effects of the lockdowns. It’ll be even more complex to isolate the effects on small business.

Until that type of complex analysis is done we’re all just going off of anecdotes, gut feelings and personal biases.
 
Back
Top