Movies

I couldn't really find a scale I liked, so I just had to give up on rating anything ever forever, and I ended up just deleting my Goodreads and Letterboxd accounts entirely (although I was in an account deleting mood at the time, none of my social networks survived either). It's nice reading a book or watching something and not having to think of a score in the back of my mind while I'm doing so.
 
LeSamourai said:
I couldn't really find a scale I liked, so I just had to give up on rating anything ever forever, and I ended up just deleting my Goodreads and Letterboxd accounts entirely (although I was in an account deleting mood at the time, none of my social networks survived either). It's nice reading a book or watching something and not having to think of a score in the back of my mind while I'm doing so.
Click to expand...
I rarely rate things on goodreads anymore, i just mark it as read. Mainly just keeps track of what I'm reading/want to read these days. Also if I can't decide what to really rate something, I just don't and move on. Again, it's all arbitrary
 
ayayrawn said:
This is all arbitrary of course, but interesting that an 8/10 is just something you liked. For me, an 8/10 is something great. I do grade differently for 5 and 10 scale though. Personally a 5/5 can be anything from 9-10/10. And a 4.5/5 and be like 8.5-9/10, etc. I don't give out 10s hardly ever, but I'll do 5/5s with some regularity.

For me, usually, it's:

5/5 - Masterpiece
4.5/5 - Excellent
4/5 - Great
3.5/5 - good
3/5 - okay
2.5/5 - mediocre/forgettable
2/5 - bad
1.5 - horrible
1 - abysmal
.5 - unwatchable
Click to expand...
I think if I'm grading movies in a vacuum, an 8/10 is great. But if I'm looking at something that has an 8.5/10 on IMDb and is in the top 250 of all time, my scale starts to get skewed. Do I give it a lower score because I feel it doesn't deserve an 8.5? Or a 10/10 because I think it deserves higher. I find I want my score to move the needle, no matter how much I know it actually won't.

Also, I sometimes rate purely off nostalgia or entertainment value. Like I'll throw a 10/10 at Armageddon just because it hits that feel for me and I try not to take myself too seriously. This also applies to comedies. Happy Gilmore has a 7/10. Do I really think it's a 3.5/5 personally? That would be 'I kinda regret watching this' territory for me.
 
Melt Face Molly Drop said:
I think if I'm grading movies in a vacuum, an 8/10 is great. But if I'm looking at something that has an 8.5/10 on IMDb and is in the top 250 of all time, my scale starts to get skewed. Do I give it a lower score because I feel it doesn't deserve an 8.5? Or a 10/10 because I think it deserves higher. I find I want my score to move the needle, no matter how much I know it actually won't.

Also, I sometimes rate purely off nostalgia or entertainment value. Like I'll throw a 10/10 at Armageddon just because it hits that feel for me and I try not to take myself too seriously. This also applies to comedies. Happy Gilmore has a 7/10. Do I really think it's a 3.5/5 personally? That would be 'I kinda regret watching this' territory for me.
Click to expand...
Can you explain why reducing the same fraction makes you feel like it's a lower score? Is there a different label on what each is supposed to mean on IMDb vs letterboxd? Otherwise 7/10 and 3.5/5 are literally the same score.
 
dhodo said:
Can you explain why reducing the same fraction makes you feel like it's a lower score? Is there a different label on what each is supposed to mean on IMDb vs letterboxd? Otherwise 7/10 and 3.5/5 are literally the same score.
Click to expand...
The Letterboxd clientele is more critical. So it’s a 7.0 on IMDb and 6.8 (3.4) on LB.

Butterfly Effect is a 7.6 and 7.0 (3.5) on LB. As @ayayrawn said above, the thought process behind a 10 point and 5 point rating system seems to throw things off a bit.
 
Just watched this and it lived up to the hype for me. Lots of fun and I really hope they keep making them.
images
 
thefilmstage.com

Martin Scorsese: “The Whole World Has Opened Up to Me, But It’s Too Late”

In development since 2016, Martin Scorsese's Killers of the Flower Moon finally has its world premiere this week at the Cannes Film Festival. While there will be much to discuss post-premiere, not to mention endless interviews in what will be a nearly year-long awards run, the director and cast...
thefilmstage.com

This is hittin. Hurts that he may only have a couple films left in him. The undisputed GOAT.

So excited for the Killers of the Flower Moon premiere this week.
 
Last edited:
ayayrawn said:
thefilmstage.com

Martin Scorsese: “The Whole World Has Opened Up to Me, But It’s Too Late”

In development since 2016, Martin Scorsese's Killers of the Flower Moon finally has its world premiere this week at the Cannes Film Festival. While there will be much to discuss post-premiere, not to mention endless interviews in what will be a nearly year-long awards run, the director and cast...
thefilmstage.com

This is hittin. Hurts that he may only have a couple films left in him. The undisputed GOAT.

So excited for the Killer of the Flower Moon premiere this week.
Click to expand...
He finally knows the answer to the question “What would you do with more time?”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top