Not often enough to get his monies worth!
Equipment Recommendations - The Home For New System and Upgrade Advice
- Thread starter Joe Mac
- Start date
TrainFan73
Frothy
Man where were you when we were talking about this a while back?
TenderLovingKiller®
Well-Known Member
I was busy building the second best stereo in the lower 48.
I dunno, I like my system more than I like some of my family
Angsty
Well-Known Member
“Hi-fi is extremely subjective”
jt4527
Well-Known Member
The $1 million stereo that sold for $157K.
Interesting story, man seemed like a bit of a dick.
Interesting story, man seemed like a bit of a dick.
MattHasIdeas
Member
I believe I’m in a similar boat. I got a shipping notification on 1/9 stating that a label was created, but no movement as of yet. I am beyond excited to get mine.
TrainFan73
Frothy
Loses value the second you drive it off the lot man.
I ordered an MP7 last week. Keith emailed and told me I’d be receiving an MP7B model. An updated version that supports MC and it would be about 3 weeks to deliver.
You all may be receiving updated models as well.
Can someone smarter than I help me understand the ramifications of replacing my NAD C 316BEE with this bad boy? I'm guessing I would lose my ability to stream music from my BluOS and listen to movies through my speakers as well via my NAD's AUX jack?
Would there be a way to have the best of the both worlds?
parttimeaudiophile.com
Would there be a way to have the best of the both worlds?
LSA VT-70 Integrated Amplifier | REVIEW
Hi-Fi news, gear reviews, and interviews
parttimeaudiophile.com
TrainFan73
Frothy
It looks pretty sweet. You can always add a node if you need the multi room use of BluOS or add a wiim product to stream, it doesn’t appear to have a dac so you probably want to go wiim pro plus, the wiim has a line in too so if you are using all three line ins you could add tv through it.Can someone smarter than I help me understand the ramifications of replacing my NAD C 316BEE with this bad boy? I'm guessing I would lose my ability to stream music from my BluOS and listen to movies through my speakers as well via my NAD's AUX jack?
Would there be a way to have the best of the both worlds?
LSA VT-70 Integrated Amplifier | REVIEW
Hi-Fi news, gear reviews, and interviews
Can someone smarter than I help me understand the ramifications of replacing my NAD C 316BEE with this bad boy? I'm guessing I would lose my ability to stream music from my BluOS and listen to movies through my speakers as well via my NAD's AUX jack?
Would there be a way to have the best of the both worlds?
LSA VT-70 Integrated Amplifier | REVIEW
Hi-Fi news, gear reviews, and interviews
All three of the inputs are at line level so you can pretty much plug anything into all 3 of them regardless of one being labeled CD. If you’re not using all 3 for music and you’re currently connecting the movies with RCA cables you can definitely still do that.
TrainFan73
Frothy
Oh shit, you have a node. Dude you’re golden, get it!
Not answering your question, but that “bad boy” isn’t. Check Stereophile’s review. It didn’t meet published specs in regards to output power. It made a paltry 7 watts per channel if I recall correctly.Can someone smarter than I help me understand the ramifications of replacing my NAD C 316BEE with this bad boy? I'm guessing I would lose my ability to stream music from my BluOS and listen to movies through my speakers as well via my NAD's AUX jack?
Would there be a way to have the best of the both worlds?
LSA VT-70 Integrated Amplifier | REVIEW
Hi-Fi news, gear reviews, and interviews
Edit for quote from Stereophile’s measurements:
“LSA specifies the VT-70's maximum power as 35Wpc into 8 ohms (15.44dBW), which is what I would expect from a push-pull pair of EL34 tubes operated in Ultralinear mode. (The traces in figs.5–7 were taken with the left channel but with both channels operating.) With our usual definition of clipping—when the THD+noise reaches 1%—and with both channels driven, I measured a clipping power of just 7Wpc from the 8 ohm tap into 8 ohms (8.45dBW, fig.5) and the same from the 4 ohm tap into 4 ohms (5.45dBW, fig.6). Relaxing the clipping definition to 3% THD+N gave output powers of 25.3Wpc from the 8 ohm tap into 8 ohms (14.0dBW) and 28.45Wpc from the 4 ohm tap into 4 ohms (11.53dBW). The shape of the traces in these graphs suggests that the amplifier uses a limited amount of loop negative feedback. With the 4 ohm tap driving 8 ohms (fig.7), 1% THD+N was reached at 19.5Wpc (12.9dBW) and 3% THD+N at 27Wpc (14.3dBW). More significantly, the THD+N was lower at low powers than it had been with the load matched to the nominal transformer tap.”
So it makes 7 watts per channel at 1% distortion, and 25 watts at 3%. It’s not hard to get 35 watts from a quad of EL34 output tubes- it’s been done ad nauseum since the late ‘50s. I suspect wimpy transformers in the LSA are the culprit.
TrainFan73
Frothy
Never mind. Don’t get it. It is pretty though.
Are you sure its this one? Just read the review and perhaps I glazed over it but they reviewed it rather glowingly and included it in their 2023 recommended components list. Saying things like:
"for $1299 ($100 more once the intro price expires), you've got yourself a su-weet-sounding tube amplifier that has no glaring faults."
"I confess that an admiring F-bomb escaped my lips when the music started: The VT-70 produced possibly the best-reproduced male voice I've ever heard in my listening room."
Or are you saying these wouldn't be compatible with Wharfedale Lintons?
LSA VT-70 integrated amplifier Page 2
Like most tube amps, the LSA looks best without its protective cage, especially at night. There's something cool and comforting about seeing those fiery filaments out in the open. Besides, tube life may be extended when air can move freely around the hot glass. It's possible.
www.stereophile.com
Definitely positive it’s the same amp. The reviewer loved it but it bombed on the test bench.Are you sure its this one? Just read the review and perhaps I glazed over it but they reviewed it rather glowingly and included it in their 2023 recommended components list. Saying things like:
"for $1299 ($100 more once the intro price expires), you've got yourself a su-weet-sounding tube amplifier that has no glaring faults."
"I confess that an admiring F-bomb escaped my lips when the music started: The VT-70 produced possibly the best-reproduced male voice I've ever heard in my listening room."
Or are you saying these wouldn't be compatible with Wharfedale Lintons?
LSA VT-70 integrated amplifier Page 2
Like most tube amps, the LSA looks best without its protective cage, especially at night. There's something cool and comforting about seeing those fiery filaments out in the open. Besides, tube life may be extended when air can move freely around the hot glass. It's possible.
Many aren’t aware but every single product reviewed at Stereophile lands somewhere on their recommended list- rated somewhere between A+ down to D.
It’s not a good match for the Lintons. I wouldn’t buy it at all. But you might like it. Just be aware of what you are getting, which in my opinion isn’t much.
@Ghost if you want a tube amp, I can recommend this:
JoLida Audio JD202BRC Integrated Stereo Tube Amplifier Black
Amazon.com
No subwoofer outputs if that’s important to you. Sounds great, will do 35 watts per channel and would be fine with the Lintons.
JoLida Audio JD202BRC Integrated Stereo Tube Amplifier Black
Amazon.com
No subwoofer outputs if that’s important to you. Sounds great, will do 35 watts per channel and would be fine with the Lintons.
Thanks for the rec! Would your rec change with a budget up to $2000?