Melt Face Molly Drop
Well-Known Member
Yore - Evenings. Seem this has been out of print for some time, and has the distinction of being a VMP alum before they did their exclusives. Ltd to 250:
Damn this is dope. Ordered, thanks for sharing!
I have a copy, no idea what pressing but it sounds pretty good. Is this a SRC release? I have some of their blink reissues and they sound great.Slipknot - Slipknot LP
Buy Slipknot - Slipknot on vinyl LP at SRCVinyl for less. 2001 Roadrunner Records Slipknot release.www.srcvinyl.com
I still have a soft spot for this album. It says back in print, so I hope that means better quality. I read about the last prints being bad...
The address you posted was to an apartment complex and your point could’ve been made without it. Either my investigative skills are deteriorating, or they’ve since removed that information from their sites/profiles, but I could not find anything public that was as specific as what you posted. Whether it should be considered ‘doxxing’ is beside the point, it was close enough to private information being made public that it was removed.
The problem was the address. Please look back, because that is exactly what I did. I removed the address. I am new at moderating and did the wrong thing the first time. I undeleted the message and removed the address.
Edit: Any time I see an address posted here, I google map it and it looked like an apartment complex. That was a red flag to me. and why I deleted it.
@Dead C deserves an explanation in the least, or else we’ve got VMP Forum 2.0 on our hands here.I had reached out to @Colonel_Angus privately about this matter as they are someone who's actions I generally respect around here. Hell, he colored my profile picture.
I came away from my private interaction even more concerned about this than I previously had.
So thats why I'm now coming to the rest of the community as I do not believe this is at all how we would like to see how our mod team act and react. And well, when your mod/staff team fails you its time to duscuss it publicly.
Dead C has pointed out again that no, its a public address.
Both @Colonel_Angus (perhaps in a slightly condescending way) and @Kris both doubled down on the decision.
I've since shown that its not only a public address but certainly an address for multiple businesses. At which point they stopped replying.
I thought that seemed odd as I'd hope our mod team would be willing to learn and discuss things in public. Especially when we know at least one mod had threatened a banishment over the(now shown to be a non) issue.
So I asked @Colonel_Angus about it privately, which you can see the full response below.
This was how he responded, which I found concerning. A mod/staff was willing to double down publicly, but in light of new evidence refuses to respond publicly.
I find this to be quite problematic.
@Dead C deserves an explanation in the least, or else we’ve got VMP Forum 2.0 on our hands here.
My willingness (or lack thereof) to address something like this in a DM to a party with whom had no direct involvement with the matter shouldn’t be of any concern to you. This matter is still being discussed and a NO response to your inquiry is still applicable. As someone who also generally respects your actions around here, I’m disappointed you used this as an attempt to “gotcha” for something there’s nothing yet to get.I had reached out to @Colonel_Angus privately about this matter as they are someone who's actions I generally respect around here. Hell, he colored my profile picture.
I came away from my private interaction even more concerned about this than I previously had.
So thats why I'm now coming to the rest of the community as I do not believe this is at all how we would like to see how our mod team act and react. And well, when your mod/staff team fails you its time to duscuss it publicly.
Dead C has pointed out again that no, its a public address.
Both @Colonel_Angus (perhaps in a slightly condescending way) and @Kris both doubled down on the decision.
I've since shown that its not only a public address but certainly an address for multiple businesses. At which point they stopped replying.
I thought that seemed odd as I'd hope our mod team would be willing to learn and discuss things in public. Especially when we know at least one mod had threatened a banishment over the(now shown to be a non) issue.
So I asked @Colonel_Angus about it privately, which you can see the full response below.
This was how he responded, which I found concerning. A mod/staff was willing to double down publicly, but in light of new evidence refuses to respond publicly.
I find this to be quite problematic.
My willingness (or lack thereof) to address something like this in a DM to a party with whom had no direct involvement with the matter shouldn’t be of any concern to you. This matter is still being discussed and a NO response to your inquiry is still applicable. As someone who also generally respects your actions around here, I’m disappointed you used this as an attempt to “gotcha” for something there’s nothing yet to get.
If you read back you'll see im not asking about what happened privately, aside from if the mods are still discussing it. I reached out to you about what happened in public, in this conmunity that I am a part of.
What you just posted now is an excellent response to my initial query. And would have avoided me posting about it to the community.
Im not trying to, "gotcha", you literally stated, "no," when asked what the mods were doing or talking about it. And as a community member I found that alarming.
I closed with that statement intentionally. It felt like bait and I hate that I’ve become acquiesced to that line of thinking. This reply only furthers my precautions. If anything further needs to be addressed, we’ll address it.Knowing that the matter is still being discussed is awesome! And I'm so glad to hear it.
I wish you'd shared that previously instead of closing with, "if anything further needs to be addressed, we’ll address it." That's the real concerning part. It sounds like you don't think anything else needs to be addressed. Just that if there's something in the future you will.
Thats all I meant. Its not personal. I still think you're great. But as a community member i have an interest in seeing this place thrive and be fun and a big part of that is how the mod/staff team handle things, especially after they've maybe made a misstep.
If you read back, you asked if I could tell YOU what was happening with US. That’s what the no was a reply to, don’t twist it.
I closed with that statement intentionally. It felt like bait and I hate that I’ve become acquiesced to that line of thinking. This reply only furthers my precautions. If anything further needs to be addressed, we’ll address it.
New Animal Collective live album (to celebrate MPP)
Animal Collective | Releases | Domino
Domino Recording Company - Browse all releases & music by Animal Collective. Limited edition releases, deluxe vinyl records, CDs & more.animalcollective.dominomart.com
It comes out next week!
I'm on a vinyl diet and this was a no doubt about it diet breaker. The version of Fireworks on here is my favorite version of the song. They are also easily my favorite band tho
Your take away should be that, no, I will not discuss what is happening with the mods and the discussion on @Dead C.I feel like we're just having some semantics issues. I'm not trying to twist your use of the word, "no," but I'd hope that you would see that that is a very abrupt response.
Again, I'm arguing that something definitely needs to be addressed publicly. Thats my entire issue here.
Your response makes it sound like you feel the opposite. I'm not trying to gotcha or twist your words. This is just how I am reading your text. Is that what my take away from your response should be?
Your take away should be that, no, I will not discuss what is happening with the mods and the discussion on @Dead C.
That’s it.
Know this was posted over in the hip-hop thread but was it over here?
Slipknot - Slipknot LP
Buy Slipknot - Slipknot on vinyl LP at SRCVinyl for less. 2001 Roadrunner Records Slipknot release.www.srcvinyl.com
I still have a soft spot for this album. It says back in print, so I hope that means better quality. I read about the last prints being bad...
I'm sorry but I have no idea where it's being produced. I'd expect it to be done through whatever Roadrunner Records use and that SRC just has copies to sell.I have a copy, no idea what pressing but it sounds pretty good. Is this a SRC release? I have some of their blink reissues and they sound great.
I stopped after the third album. Those three albums are good enough for me. But yeah, totally I agree with you about getting those others on vinyl.i'm really surprised that a lot of people are interested in this slipknot reissue as this could've been had as for yrs. it would go on sale at amazon for $11-14 what seems like as recent as the end of last yr beginning of this yr.. just found out today till this pre-order for the reissue this was out of print and going up in value.us who enjoy slipknot have been wanting Iowa ('01) and Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) ('04) albums on vinyl for a long time now wish the label would do a reissue for these albums.i know Slipknot is a like em or hate band but i'll always have a liking for them as the self titled '99 release got me back in metal music again.