Basically to summarize Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, over the past 10 years there have been a sharp increase in laws against being homeless. New or more restrictive loitering, trespassing laws or laws that simply make it illegal to be homeless or sleep in the public. Sleeping in your car is the fastest spreading new law in many cities.
Here in America we seem to be resolved to criminalize being homeless over solving the issue. One guy they interviewed who has been homeless for 9 years says he has spent 1 out of every 3 nights in jail. As soon as he sits own he's "trespassing". If you think about it, that means he's spend 3 years in jail just for being homeless.
Since the Reagan administration we have been making economic policies that have only resulted in increased homelessness and cuts to the social safety nets that provide subsidized housing. As Reagan put it, "they are homeless by choice" and that belief is still heavily ingrained in people today. Homelessness isn't caused by the fact that the cost of housing has vastly out paced wage growth and economic policies have cut subsidies according to them. But rather mental health and addition. And while it's true a lot of homeless people suffer from addiction. Addiction wasn't the cause of homelessness, but rather the result of homelessness.
One lady they interviewed who became homeless earlier this year says it was because her landlord raised her rent by $150 a month suddenly. She couldn't afford it. When she was short of being able to cover rent in full she was evicted. Her landlord didn't want to negotiate or work out a deal. He was very much if you can't pay rent I sure as hell can find someone else who can attitude.
A city in Texas blasts 2 different children's songs at sleeping homeless people at night hoping to disperse them.
The story is the same city after city. The number of beds available in shelters is only a fraction of what is needed for each and every homeless person. For example, one city they listed has 345 beds but more than 1500 homeless.
In San Francisco the city only has 16 bathrooms (porta potties) accessible to nearly 4000 homeless people. To make matters worse they remove them at night because they don't have proper security.
News covers about homelessness is almost always through the lense of people living in homes. It's about how much a nuisance homeless are. One of the most reported topics is about human waste in the streets. But homeless people often do not have access to bathrooms at businesses and situations like in San Francisco leave people no choice. There is no place else to go.
The number of homeless people is also drastically undercounted in our country. They only count the number of homeless 1 night a year. And it only accounts for people in the shelter systems.
The leading cause of homelessness today is unaffordable housing. Of low income americans, there is only enough housing available for 40% of them.
$34,000 on average is spent per homeless person by taxpayers for medical and policing expenses for homeless people each year. They have calculated that it would only costs taxpayers a little over $10,000 a year total per homeless person if they subsidised housing. Yet time after time policy makers choose not to subsidise housing. They don't want people to become "spoiled", believe they are lazy and/or choose to be homeless.
Whenever policy makers try to do something to find housing for homeless people they get aggressive opposition from nimby's. The story is always the same. People believe something should be done about the homeless, but they do not believe their community is the spot to do it. They are worried about crime, their safety and how it will affect the local businesses.
How are we going to get people to work for peanuts if we cannot frighten them with the threat of homelessness? The problem here comes when everything starts to become unaffordable for more and more people, and they start to look at the peanuts they are given and start asking how they are supposed to pay for things.
I read a really depressing article about what happens to all the returns that people send back from online shopping. In a regular store, an item would be tried on and then put back on the rack if it doesn't fit. With online shopping, they can't just put it back into rotation, especially if the clothes were packaged from the factory in bags already. Most of these items end up getting donated or thrown away. Now, because there are some things from some very high end places, there are some items that they don't want to donate here in the states because it would "dilute the brand".
Right now, I see a lot of the same patterns. We are withholding things from people in order to make sure that commercial entities can function. We have decided to gut social programs and not fund any new programs so that we have enough to buy weapons--because this is one of the few things we actually do make over here--and bail out corporate bad actors. We are letting people die from preventable and treatable diseases, while limping our anemic "service based" economy along, because that's the only care we are going to invest in. Over and over papers and models show that higher wages, nationalized medical care, and sick leave can help our economy improve, but corporations do not want to raise wages because the masses might actually come to expect a living wage and a medical system built for everyone.
Did John Oliver hit on the diseases that we are finding in homeless populations that we thought we had eradicated like trench foot and bubonic plague? Part of the reason we have societal standards has to do with disease control. When society breaks down, this sort of stuff happens. We forgot that it takes all of us together to move forward and have honed in on individual freedom as our only focus.