Yeah, I figured that to be the one:
Sorry that it isn't a better image.
Nothing about the above response changes my opinion. In fact, it was what dimmed my opinion of her. You don't control your staffers, and I was wiling to give her the benefit of the doubt that the acted as lone wolfs. But her response fans the flames, and cements the idea this was a move made with her sign off.
And if Warren asked Bernie for his opinion on the matter in a personal meeting between friends where they were there to discuss, specifically, whether their room for two progressives in the race and who might have the better shot of beating Trump (which is what was reported by numerous outlets at the time) than it is super fucked up of her camp to then later use that answer against him.
I think Bernie probably came out too strong in his initial response to the accusations, but that on the whole he is right that the framing of them is ludicrous. I'm sorry, I simply don't believe that the same guy who has supported the idea of a female president numerous times over the years- including encouraging Warren to run in 2016 BEFORE doing so himself when she refused- would come out and point blank say that a female couldn't beat Trump. It seems completely out of character.
I do believe that, if asked, he might have framed exactly as the sources above indicate- a discussion of the ways in which Trump might attempt to utilize gender in a gross but impactful manner.
But again, all of that is beside the point. Warren is causing damage to both candidates right now that directly impact both Trump and Biden's chances of gaining the nomination. Which means she is actively attempting to sabotage Bernie in exchange for some sort of cabinet position or that she is a god awful tactician who thought this move would actually help her become president.
