Needles & Grooves

yukbon
yukbon
Anyone that doesn't like AC/DC can't be trusted
debianlinux
debianlinux
For most things I hate the low consecration end but for like horror movies, why are we being picky here? Also, for TV it looks all low consecration to me.
kvetcha
kvetcha
T
TheThinWhiteDuke
Imagine thinking the Ellen DeGeneres Show is high concept art
bettim84
bettim84
And Foo Fighters? They’re medium consecration at best.
Indymisanthrope
Indymisanthrope
"High status" here is looking pretty "basic" to me.
Indymisanthrope
Indymisanthrope
Not to mention the cultural/racial biases implicit in what is "considered" high consecration.
KenKaniff
KenKaniff
burn it to the ground!
yukbon
yukbon
re: ellen/oprah - you may not consider them top-tier, but their peers/competition and they most definitely are consistently decent daytime tv that show consideration to guests and audience. Competition: Dr Phil, Geraldo Rivera, Rikki Lake, etc. Like the "...you are not the father!" schticks, "cash me outside howbow dat" etc. Ellen may be a terrible human and boss, but the show's cachet was built on her likeability.
TenderLovingKiller®
TenderLovingKiller®
LOL! Everyone’s got too hung up on High/Middle/Low consecration.
W
waruv
This is a really astute observation and I think very much on point.
duke86fan
duke86fan
Tbh the red hot chili peppers placement makes me think of that one scene in the good place

Also conan is/was best talk show host
duke86fan
duke86fan
I also feel like Britney Spears even in the cultural significance or "cool" category is not really low. She deserves more respect and probably should at least have been medium.
Indymisanthrope
Indymisanthrope
@TenderLovingKiller® I don't think it's a mistake to focus on the "high consecration" stuff, since the thesis is that someone with high status taste not only likes a broad range, but that their engagement is very shallow. Overall it reads like gatekeeping/canonization of culture to me, and from a pretty predictable worldview.
TenderLovingKiller®
TenderLovingKiller®
@Indymisanthrope i guess I miss the “gatekeeping” portion of it and I am hardly an academic so forgive me if I missed something but the way I am reading it is they let “society” determine what was low/medium/high consecration based on data, I am sure the data would skew more white and wealthy as a whole as society typically holds white/wealthy things in higher regard (from a class/elite standpoint).
TenderLovingKiller®
TenderLovingKiller®
The point is that it’s changing and maybe 30 years ago it was deemed “cool” to be into Alternative rock and write off Country or Hip-Hip it is now considered “cool” to have shallow depth across styles and genres.
TenderLovingKiller®
TenderLovingKiller®
@Indymisanthrope I get it, you love Paul Blart Mall Cop. That is fine I certainly don’t think any less of ya for it.
Jonathan Y
Jonathan Y
I got to give a high five to the individual that got paid for their time spent doing this. They got things figured out in life lmaooo
TenderLovingKiller®
TenderLovingKiller®
@Jonathan Y right? I am sure they are not living like Kings as sociologists but their are certainly a hell of a lot worse ways to earn a living.
dhodo
dhodo
I think using the Grammys as part of "letting society determine consecration level" is a big miss since it has such a strong reputation of being a popularity contest. think they miss the mark on that metric and their rating is very muddied but also very restricted by limiting everything to pop, which is a very small subset of music. Not choosing bands with higher metacritic ratings but no Grammy makes this apparent.
Back
Top