Vinyl Me Please (store, exclusives, swaps, etc)

Has anyone seen the video Storf made for the VMP instagram?

It basically shows him walking through his house, opening the front door and picking up his package, then walking over to the turntable and playing it. The thing is that the record looks MAD warped. Even if it's just a visual effect of the video being fast, why wouldn't they see it and think about refilming? Crazy.

Edit: Might have found a way to link it....


That ain’t Storf, but that record is warped AF.
 
Has anyone seen the video Storf made for the VMP instagram?

It basically shows him walking through his house, opening the front door and picking up his package, then walking over to the turntable and playing it. The thing is that the record looks MAD warped. Even if it's just a visual effect of the video being fast, why wouldn't they see it and think about refilming? Crazy.

Edit: Might have found a way to link it....



I have to say though, I'm liking the Gabor Szabo release
 
I realised afterwards that it wasnt him, I saw the dog in the coat and seemed to think it was his.

Funny thing is that they actually tried responding to say it was because the video was 'fast motion'. :ROFLMAO:
It probably comes off as more severe being sped up but it isn’t flat. Like you said they shoulda done a 2nd take.
 
Not it was?
In this case it’s not “it was” vs “it were,” but “if it was” vs “if it were.”

Were should be used when the subjunctive case is being used to make a statement that is contrary to fact, as in “Were I a dummy, I’d believe that record isn’t warped even though I can see that it is.” The dependent criterion here is whether the idea that the record is warped is indeed contrary to fact. If it is, then the grammar is correct. If not, they’re grammatically gaslighting you.
 
In this case it’s not “it was” vs “it were,” but “if it was” vs “if it were.”

Were should be used when the subjunctive case is being used to make a statement that is contrary to fact, as in “Were I a dummy, I’d believe that record isn’t warped even though I can see that it is.” The dependent criterion here is whether the idea that the record is warped is indeed contrary to fact. If it is, then the grammar is correct. If not, they’re grammatically gaslighting you.

Ok you’re right, I apologise. Still sounds like shit.
 
Back
Top